Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
acid at 9.1, re-equilibrating for 0.9 min ready for
the next sample. For plasma extracts, protocols
for the RPLC-MS analysis of both serum/plasma
and urine have been reported.
10,11
For samples such as urine, minimal sample
preparation is required (often only centrifuga-
tion and dilution
11,14
) and a typical UPLC sepa-
ration is shown in
Figure 1
. With samples, such
as plasma or serum
9,10,15,16
or tissues
18
e
20
,itis
essential to remove proteins prior to LC analysis
in order to protect the column. It is also the case,
as indicated previously, that relative contribu-
tions of polar and nonpolar metabolites (e.g.,
lipids) differ considerably between urine- and
blood-derived or tissue samples. As a result,
the gradient used for the analysis of such
samples often begins at a higher proportion of
the organic solvent than employed for urine.
Lipids are also more strongly retained on RPLC
columns and, as a result, their elution (and
column cleaning after the analysis) requires
more eluotropic solvent for elution and wash
steps. Generally, methanol (or other alcohols)
appears to be a better solvent for eluting lipidic
contaminants compared to, for example, acetoni-
trile and a typical (UPLC) analysis of such
a sample would use separation on a 1.7
m, 2.1
m
100 mm, Acuity BEH column 50
C eluted
with 0.1% aqueous formic acid (solvent A) and
methanol (also containing 0.1% formic acid,
solvent B) at 0.4 mL/min. The gradient program
employed a series of linear steps, beginning at
95% aqueous formic acid for 0.5 min., and
changing to 60% A at 2.5 min, then to 30% A at
4.5 min and
finally rising to 100% B at 10 min.
This solvent composition was held for 2 min
before the column was returned to 95% aqueous
formic acid, where it was held for 2.5 min prior
to the next sample. The very high ef
ciency of
UHPLC often means
that
chromatographic
FIGURE 1
UHPLC-TOFMS (+ESI) of rodent urine on an Acquity BEH C18 2.1
100 mm 1.7
m
M column (maintained at
40
C) using a solvent gradient of 0.1% aqueous formic acid versus acetonitrile (containing 0.1% formic acid). The upper trace
shows the metabolites recovered from a
“
blood spot
”
paper and the lower trace is of the unextracted urine. Details can be
found in reference 29.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search