Using Data-Independent Mass Spectrometry to Extend Detectable Dynamic Range without Prior Fractionation - Proteomic and Metabolomic Approaches to Biomarker Discovery - page 125

References
1. Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based pro-
teomics. Nature 2003;422:198 e 207.
2. Cargile BJ, Sevinsky JR, Essader AS, et al. Immobilized
pH gradient isoelectric focusing as a

peptide mixtures from tandem mass spectra. Nat
Methods 2004;1:39 e 45.
16. Panchaud A, Jung S, Shaffer SA, et al. Faster, quanti-
tative, and accurate precursor acquisition independent
from ion count. Anal Chem 2011;83:2250 e 7.
17. Hengel SM, Murray E, Langdon S, et al. Data-inde-
pendent proteomic screen identi

first-dimension
separation in shotgun proteomics. J Biomol Tech 2005;
16:181 e 9.
3. Link AJ, Eng J, Schieltz DM, et al. Direct analysis of
protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nat Bio-
technol 1999;17:676 e 82.

es novel tamoxifen
agonist that mediates drug resistance. J Proteome Res
2011;10:4567 e 78.
18. Acosta-Martin AE, Panchaud A, Chwastyniak M, et al.
Quantitative mass spectrometry analysis using

4. Shevchenko A, Jensen ON, Podtelejnikov AV, et al.

Linking genome and proteome by mass spectrometry:
large-scale identi

cation of plasma diagnostic
biomarkers for abdominal aortic aneurysm. PLoS One
2011;6:e28698.
19. Thompson A, Schafer J, Kuhn K, et al. Tandem mass
tags: a novel quanti

PAcIFIC for the identi

cation of yeast proteins from two
dimensional gels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:
14440 e 5.
5. Bantscheff M, Schirle M, Sweetman G, et al. Quantita-
tive mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review.
Anal Bioanal Chem 2007;389:1017 e 31.
6. Gatlin CL, Eng JK, Cross ST, et al. Automated identi-

cation strategy for comparative
analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal
Chem 2003;75:1895 e 904.
20. Hoopmann MR, Finney GL, MacCoss MJ. High-speed
data reduction, feature detection, and MS/MS spec-
trum quality assessment of shotgun proteomics data
sets using high-resolution mass spectrometry. Anal
Chem 2007;79:5620 e 32.
21. Ghaemmaghami S, Huh WK, Bower K, et al. Global
analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 2003;425:
737 e 41.
22. Picotti P, Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, et al. Full
dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by
targeted proteomics. Cell 2009;138:795 e 806.
23 Omenn GS, States DJ, Adamski M, et al. Overview of
the HUPO Plasma Proteome Project: results from the
pilot phase with 35 collaborating laboratories and
multiple analytical groups, generating a core dataset of
3020 proteins and a publicly-available database. Pro-
teomics 2005;5:3226 e 45.
24. States DJ, Omenn GS, Blackwell TW, et al. Challenges
in deriving high-con

fication of amino acid sequence variations in proteins
by HPLC/microspray tandem mass spectrometry. Anal
Chem 2000;72:757 e 63.
7. Liu H, Sadygov RG, Yates 3rd JR. A model for random
sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance
in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 2004;76:4193 e 201.

8. Spahr CS, Davis MT, McGinley MD, et al.

Towards de ning the urinary proteome using liquid

chromatography-tandemmass spectrometry. I. Pro ling

an unfractionated tryptic digest. Proteomics 2001;1:
93 e 107.
9. Yi EC, Marelli M, Lee H, et al. Approaching complete
peroxisome characterization by gas-phase fractionation.
Electrophoresis 2002;23:3205 e 16.
10. Scherl A, Shaffer SA, Taylor GK, et al. Genome-speci c

gas-phase fractionation strategy for improved shotgun
proteomic pro ling of proteotypic peptides. Anal Chem

2008;80:1182 e 91.
11. Scherl A, Tsai YS, Shaffer SA, et al. Increasing information
from shotgun proteomic data by accounting for misas-
signed precursor ion masses. Proteomics 2008;8:2791 e 7.
12. Panchaud A, Scherl A, Shaffer SA, et al. Precursor
acquisition independent from ion count: how to dive
deeper into the proteomics ocean. Anal Chem 2009;81:
6481 e 8.
13. Masselon C, Anderson GA, Harkewicz R, et al. Accurate
mass multiplexed tandem mass spectrometry for high-
throughput polypeptide identi

cations from
data gathered by a HUPO plasma proteome collabo-
rative study. Nat Biotechnol 2006;24:333 e 8.
25. Faca V, Pitteri SJ, Newcomb L, et al. Contribution
of protein fractionation to depth of analysis of the
serum and plasma proteomes. J Proteome Res 2007;
6:3558 e 65.
26. Whiteaker JR, Zhang H, Eng JK, et al. Head-to-head
comparison of serum fractionation techniques. J Pro-
teome Res 2007;6:828 e 36.
27. Zhang Q, Menon R, Deutsch EW, et al. A mouse
plasma peptide atlas as a resource for disease proteo-
mics. Genome Biol 2008;9:R93.
28. Veronesi U, Boyle P, Goldhirsch A, et al. Breast cancer.
Lancet 2005;365:1727 e 41.
29. Hinestrosa MC, Dickersin K, Klein P, et al. Shaping the
future of biomarker research in breast cancer to ensure
clinical relevance. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:309 e 15.

dence protein identi

cation from mixtures.

Anal Chem 2000;72:1918 e 24.
14. Purvine S, Eppel JT, Yi EC, et al. Shotgun collision-
induced dissociation of peptides using a time of flight

mass analyzer. Proteomics 2003;3:847 e 50.
15. Venable JD, Dong MQ, Wohlschlegel J, et al. Auto-
mated approach for quantitative analysis of complex