How Studying Interactions Between Animal Emotions, Cognition, and Personality Can Contribute to Improve Farm - Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals - page 105

Cafe, L.M., Robinson, D.L., Ferguson, D.M., McIntyre, B.L., Geesink, G.H., Greenwood, P.L., 2011.
Cattle temperament: persistence of assessments and associations with productivity, efficiency,
carcass and meat quality traits. J. Anim. Sci. 89, 1452 1465.
Carere, C., Welink, D., Drent, P.J., Koolhaas, J.M., Groothuis, T.G.G., 2001. Effect of social
defeat in a territorial bird (Parus major) selected for different coping styles. Physiol. Behav.
73, 427 433.
Christensen, J.W., Keeling, L.J., Nielsen, B.L., 2005. Responses of horses to novel visual,
olfactory and auditory stimuli. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci. 93, 53 65.
Coe, C.L., Lubach, G.R., 2003. Critical periods of special health relevance for psychoneuroim-
munology. Brain. Behav. Immun. 17, 3 12.
Cohen, S., Janicki-Devertsa, D., Doyle, W.J., Miller, G.E., Frank, E., Rabin, B.S., et al., 2012.
Chronic stress, glucocorticoid receptor resistance, inflammation, and disease risk. PNAS
109, 5995 5999.

Colborn, D.R., Thompson Jr., D.L., Roth, T.L., Capehart, J.S., White, K.L., 1991. Responses of
cortisol and prolactin to sexual excitement and stress in stallions and geldings. J. Anim. Sci.
69, 2556.
Coulon, M., Nowak, R., Andanson, S., Ravel, C., Marnet, P.G., Boissy, A., et al., 2012.
Human lamb bonding: oxytocin, cortisol and behavioural responses of lambs to human
contacts and social separation. Psychoneuroendocrinology

, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.

psyneuen.2012.07.008 . .
Coutellier, L., Arnould, C., Boissy, A., Orgeur, P., Prunier, A., Veissier, I., et al., 2007. Pig's
responses to repeated social regrouping and relocation during the growing-finishing period.
Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 105, 102 114.
Craig, J.V., Swanson, J.C., 1994. Review: welfare perspectives on hens kept for egg production.
Poultry Sci. 73, 921 938.
Crespi, L.P., 1942. Quantitative variation in incentive and performance in the white rat.
American J. Psychol. 40, 467 517.
Dantzer, R., 1988. Les ´ motions. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, p.121.
Dantzer, R., 2002. Can farm animal welfare be understood without taking into account the issues
of emotion and cognition? J. Anim. Sci. 80, E1 E9.
Dantzer, R., Morm ` de, P., 1983. Stress in farm animals: a need for reevaluation. J. Anim. Sci.
57, 6 18.
Davis, G.P., Denise, S.K., 1998. The impact of genetic markers on selection. J. Anim. Sci. 76,
2331 2339.
Dawkins, M.S., 1990. From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness, and animal welfare.
Behav. Brain Sci. 13, 1 61.

Dawkins, M.S., 2001. How can we recognise and assess good welfare? In: Broom, D.M. (Ed.),
Coping with Challenge: Welfare in Animals Including Humans. Dahlem University Press,
Berlin, pp. 63 76.

D´sir´, L., Boissy, A., Veissier, I., 2002. Emotions in farm animals: a new approach to animal
welfare in applied ethology. Behav. Process. 60, 165 180.
D´sir´, L., Veissier, I., Despr´s, G., Boissy, A., 2004. On the way to assess emotions in animals:
do lambs evaluate an event through its suddenness, novelty or unpredictability? J. Comp.
Psychol. 118, 363 374.
D´sir´, L., Veissier, I., Despr´s, G., Delval, E., Toporenko, G., Boissy, A., 2006. Appraisal pro-
cess in sheep: interactive effect of suddenness and unfamiliarity on cardiac and behavioural
responses. J. Comp. Psychol. 120, 280 287.