Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
temperatures . Expanding in powers of β , we may use the approximation
exp
+ 2 β 2
2 . In this case, we may proceed as above,
{−
β
H}
1
β
H
H
and the result is
2 F
∂x∂y + β
∂y
∂x∂y = 2
∂x
∂y
H
∂x
2
(2 . 1 . 6)
H +
β 2
∂x ,
∂y
( β 3 ) ,
O
where the second- and higher-order terms vanish if one of the derivatives
of
itself.
In many instances, it is more convenient to consider the angular
momentum rather than the magnetic moment, with a corresponding
field variable h i = B H i , so that the Zeeman term (2 . 1 . 1 c ) becomes
H
commutes with
H
H Z =
µ i
· H i =
J i
· h i .
(2 . 1 . 7)
i
i
Since the exchange and anisotropy terms in H do not depend explicitly
on the field, ∂H/∂H = −µ and, using eqn (2.1.5), we have
µ
=
∂F/∂H
or
J
=
∂F/∂h .
(2 . 1 . 8)
Next, we define the non-local susceptibilities
χ αβ ( ij )= ∂µ i /∂H = −∂ 2 F/∂H ∂H ,
(2 . 1 . 9 a )
and similarly
χ αβ ( ij )=( B ) 2 χ αβ ( ij )=
−∂ 2 F/∂h ∂h ,
(2 . 1 . 9 b )
and the corresponding Fourier transforms, e.g.
N
ij
χ αβ ( ij ) e −i q · ( R i R j ) =
j
χ αβ ( q )= 1
χ αβ ( ij ) e −i q · ( R i R j ) .
(2 . 1 . 9 c )
The final equality only applies in a uniform system. If the field is in-
creased by an infinitesimal amount δ H ( q )exp( i q · R i ), the individual
moments are changed by
=
j
χ αβ ( ij ) δH β ( q ) e i q · R j ,
δ
µ
(2 . 1 . 10 a )
β
according to (2.1.9). Hence the added harmonically-varying field intro-
duces one Fourier component in the magnetization:
V
i
V
β
δM α ( q )= 1
e −i q · R i = N
χ αβ ( q ) δH β ( q ) ,
δ
µ
(2 . 1 . 10 b )
Search WWH ::




Custom Search