Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
temperatures
. Expanding in powers of
β
, we may use the approximation
exp
+
2
β
2
2
. In this case, we may proceed as above,
{−
β
H}
1
−
β
H
H
and the result is
∂
2
F
∂x∂y
+
β
∂
∂y
∂x∂y
=
∂
2
∂x
∂
∂y
−
∂
H
∂x
∂
2
∂
(2
.
1
.
6)
H
+
β
2
∂x
,
∂
∂y
(
β
3
)
,
−
O
where the second- and higher-order terms vanish if one of the derivatives
of
itself.
In many instances, it is more convenient to consider the angular
momentum rather than the magnetic moment, with a corresponding
field variable
h
i
=
gµ
B
H
i
, so that the Zeeman term (2
.
1
.
1
c
) becomes
H
commutes with
H
H
Z
=
−
µ
i
·
H
i
=
−
J
i
·
h
i
.
(2
.
1
.
7)
i
i
Since the exchange and anisotropy terms in
H
do not depend explicitly
on the field,
∂H/∂H
iα
=
−µ
iα
and, using eqn (2.1.5), we have
µ
iα
=
−
∂F/∂H
iα
or
J
iα
=
−
∂F/∂h
iα
.
(2
.
1
.
8)
Next, we define the non-local susceptibilities
χ
αβ
(
ij
)=
∂µ
i
/∂H
jβ
=
−∂
2
F/∂H
iα
∂H
jβ
,
(2
.
1
.
9
a
)
and similarly
χ
αβ
(
ij
)=(
gµ
B
)
−
2
χ
αβ
(
ij
)=
−∂
2
F/∂h
iα
∂h
jβ
,
(2
.
1
.
9
b
)
and the corresponding Fourier transforms, e.g.
N
ij
χ
αβ
(
ij
)
e
−i
q
·
(
R
i
−
R
j
)
=
j
χ
αβ
(
q
)=
1
χ
αβ
(
ij
)
e
−i
q
·
(
R
i
−
R
j
)
.
(2
.
1
.
9
c
)
The final equality only applies in a uniform system. If the field is in-
creased by an infinitesimal amount
δ
H
(
q
)exp(
i
q
·
R
i
), the individual
moments are changed by
=
j
χ
αβ
(
ij
)
δH
β
(
q
)
e
i
q
·
R
j
,
δ
µ
iα
(2
.
1
.
10
a
)
β
according to (2.1.9). Hence the added harmonically-varying field intro-
duces one Fourier component in the magnetization:
V
i
V
β
δM
α
(
q
)=
1
e
−i
q
·
R
i
=
N
χ
αβ
(
q
)
δH
β
(
q
)
,
δ
µ
iα
(2
.
1
.
10
b
)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search