Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
and
I
(
r
)
e
−i
q
·
r
d
r
.
I
(
q
)=
1
V
(1
.
4
.
17)
Summing over the lattice sites, counting each interaction once only, we
find that the indirect-exchange interaction takes the familiar isotropic
Heisenberg form:
χ
(
q
)
I
(
q
)
I
(
(2
π
)
3
ij
1
2
V
N
2
µ
2
B
V
−
q
)
e
i
q
·
(
R
i
−
R
j
)
S
i
·
S
j
d
q
H
ff
=
−
2
N
q
ij
J
S
(
q
)
e
i
q
·
(
R
i
−
R
j
)
S
i
·
S
j
1
=
−
2
1
=
−
ij
J
S
(
ij
)
S
i
·
S
j
,
(1
.
4
.
18)
where
N
J
S
(
ij
)=
1
q
J
S
(
q
)
e
i
q
·
(
R
i
−
R
j
)
(1
.
4
.
19)
and
V
Nµ
2
B
|
2
χ
(
q
)
.
J
S
(
q
)=
I
(
q
)
|
(1
.
4
.
20)
In the presence of an orbital moment, it is convenient to express
(1.4.18) in terms of
J
rather than
S
, which we may do within the ground-
state multiplet by using (1.2.29) to project
S
on to
J
, obtaining
2
1
H
ff
=
−
ij
J
(
ij
)
J
i
·
J
j
,
(1
.
4
.
21)
with
1)
2
q
J
S
(
q
)
,
N
1
J
(
q
)=(
g
−
J
S
(
q
)
−
(1
.
4
.
22)
where we have also subtracted the interaction of the
i
th moment with
itself, as this term only leads to the constant contribution to the Hamil-
tonian;
1
1)
2
N
J
S
(
ii
)
J
(
J
+ 1). The origin of the indirect ex-
change in the polarization of the conduction-electron gas by the spin
on one ion, and the influence of this polarization on the spin of a
second ion, is apparent in the expression (1.4.20) for
−
2
(
g
−
J
S
(
q
).
As we
shall see, it is the Fourier transform [
(
0
)] which may be di-
rectly deduced from measurements of the dispersion relations for the
magnetic excitations, and its experimentally determined variation with
q
in the
c
-direction for the heavy rare earths is shown in Fig. 1.17.
J
(
q
)
−J
Search WWH ::
Custom Search