Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
We have introduced the dynamic correlation function
S
αβ
(
κ
,ω
), defined
by eqn (3.2.13), with
α
=
N
−
2
j
and
β
=
N
−
2
j
J
jα
e
−i
κ
·
R
j
J
j
β
e
i
κ
·
R
j
,
and the corresponding susceptibility function
χ
αβ
(
,ω
), utilizing the
relation between the two functions given by the fluctuation-dissipation
theorem (3.2.18).
An important consequence of (4.2.2-3) is that the
inelastic scat-
tering of neutrons
is proportional to the correlation function
S
αβ
(
κ
,ω
),
which is essentially the Fourier transform of the probability that, if the
moment at site
j
has some specified vector value at time zero, then the
moment at site
j
has some other specified value at time
t
.Aninelas-
tic neutron-scattering experiment is thus extremely informative about
the dynamics of the magnetic system. Poles in the correlation function,
or in
χ
αβ
(
κ
,ω
), are reflected as peaks in the intensity of the scattered
neutrons. According to (4.1.2) and (4.1.3), each neutron in such a scat-
tering peak has imparted energy
hω
and momentum
h
κ
to the sample,
so the peak is interpreted, depending on whether
hω
is positive or neg-
ative, as being due to the creation or annihilation of
quasi-particles
or
elementary excitations
in the system, with energy
κ
|
hω
|
and crystal mo-
mentum
h
q
=
h
(
κ
−
τ
), where
τ
is a reciprocal lattice vector. A part
of the momentum
h
may be transferred to the crystal as a whole. If
the sample is a single crystal, with only one magnetic atom per unit
cell,
S
αβ
(
τ
is normally chosen so
that
q
lies within the primitive Brillouin zone. The form factor in the
scattering amplitude is not however invariant with respect to the addi-
tion of a reciprocal lattice vector. This interpretation of the poles in
S
αβ
(
q
,ω
) governs the choice of sign in the exponential arguments in
both the temporal and the spatial Fourier transforms.
The relation (4
.
2
.
3
c
) between the scattering function and the gen-
eralized susceptibility implies that the neutron may be considered as
a magnetic probe which effectively establishes a frequency- and wave-
vector-dependent magnetic field in the scattering sample, and detects
its response to this field. This is a particularly fruitful way of look-
ing at a neutron scattering experiment because, as shown in Chapter
3, the susceptibility may be calculated from linear response theory, and
thus provides a natural bridge between theory and experiment. Using
the symmetry relation (3.2.15), which may here be written
χ
αβ
(
q
,z
)=
χ
αβ
(
κ
,ω
)=
S
αβ
(
q
=
κ
−
τ
,ω
), where
τ
z
∗
), it is straightforward to show that
χ
αβ
(
q
,ω
)+
χ
βα
(
q
,ω
)is
−
q
,
−
real and equal to Im
χ
αβ
(
q
,ω
)+
χ
βα
(
q
,ω
)
. In addition, the form of the
inelastic cross-section, and also the result (3.3.2) for the dissipation rate,
impose another analytic condition on the function
χ
αβ
(
q
,ω
)+
χ
βα
(
q
,ω
).
Search WWH ::
Custom Search