Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
0
are smooth, there are other alternatives. In [ 26 ], the authors require
B i .t/
to be connected. Applying Proposition 4.1 , this implies that the rigid velocity on
B i .t/ is uniquely defined, so that
B
i and
B i moves as one block and cannot split. In [ 51 ],
the condition that
B i .t/ remains connected is obtained by construction. The authors
apply that, for any radial function W R d
! Œ0; 1/ of unitary mass there holds
D ,forall 2 R
(where stands for the classical convolution operator).
Consequently, the authors choose to replace the unknown ' i with the indicator
function i of the ı-interior of
B i .t/:
B i .t/Œ ı WD fx 2 B i .t/ s.t. B.x;ı/ B i .t/g:
(4.35)
This function is a weak solution to
) (4.36)
@ t i Cr. i Œ u ı / D 0;
on .0;T/ ;
i .0; / D 1 B
i Œ ı ; on :
0
where Œ u ı D u ı for a radial mollifier ı such that Supp. ı / B.0;ı/. Then,
' i is computed as the indicator of the ı-exterior of Supp. i /:
[
ŒSupp. i / ı WD
B.x;ı/:
(4.37)
x 2 Supp. i /
The parameter ı>0is fixed sufficiently small in order that the operation ı-exterior
is the converse operation of ı-interior on
i :
B
0
i ı Œ ı D Œ
0
i Œ ı ı D B
0
i ;
Œ
B
B
8 i 2f1;:::;ng:
(4.38)
i has a sufficiently smooth boundary. When u is a rigid velocity-
field u i on Supp.' i /, there holds Œ u ı D
Such a ı exists if
B
u i D
u on Supp. i /. Moreover as Œ u ı 2
L 1 .0;T I C loc . R d //,theflowt 7! M
t i associated with Œ u ı is well defined and
i / is an open connected subset of ,forall
i 2f1;:::;ng and the difficulty is overcome.
Finally, once it is obtained that the body domain
t i .
lipschitzian. In particular
B i .t/ D M
B
.t/ is made of n rigid bodies,
it is classical to show that if u is smooth in the remaining fluid domain and
satisfies ( 4.32 ), then there exists a pressure p so that ( 4.9 ) holds true in a classical
sense. As long as no contact occurs and the solid boundaries are smooth, it is
also possible to lift any set of rigid velocities on the
S
B i .t/'s into a test-function
w
Q S ; in order to prove that ( 4.12 )and( 4.13 ) are also satisfied with i
and ! i computed w.r.t. u j B i .t/ . If the body boundaries and container boundary are
smooth, we might also apply trace arguments to recover ( 4.10 )-( 4.11 ).
We proceed with detailing the construction of weak solutions. As classical, the
main points in such constructions are
2 K
Œ
(i) Definition of approximate problems;
(ii) Existence of solutions to the approximate problems;
Search WWH ::




Custom Search