Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
0
are smooth, there are other alternatives. In [
26
], the authors require
B
i
.t/
to be connected. Applying Proposition
4.1
, this implies that the rigid velocity on
B
i
.t/ is uniquely defined, so that
B
i
and
B
i
moves as one block and cannot split. In [
51
],
the condition that
B
i
.t/ remains connected is obtained by construction. The authors
apply that, for any radial function W
R
d
! Œ0; 1/ of unitary mass there holds
D ,forall 2
R
(where stands for the classical convolution operator).
Consequently, the authors choose to replace the unknown '
i
with the indicator
function
i
of the ı-interior of
B
i
.t/:
B
i
.t/Œ
ı
WD fx 2
B
i
.t/ s.t. B.x;ı/
B
i
.t/g:
(4.35)
This function is a weak solution to
)
(4.36)
@
t
i
Cr.
i
Œ
u
ı
/ D 0;
on .0;T/ ;
i
.0; / D
1
B
i
Œ
ı
; on :
0
where Œ
u
ı
D
u
ı
for a radial mollifier
ı
such that Supp.
ı
/ B.0;ı/. Then,
'
i
is computed as the indicator of the ı-exterior of Supp.
i
/:
[
ŒSupp.
i
/
ı
WD
B.x;ı/:
(4.37)
x
2
Supp.
i
/
The parameter ı>0is fixed sufficiently small in order that the operation ı-exterior
is the converse operation of ı-interior on
i
:
B
0
i
ı
Œ
ı
D Œ
0
i
Œ
ı
ı
D
B
0
i
;
Œ
B
B
8 i 2f1;:::;ng:
(4.38)
i
has a sufficiently smooth boundary. When
u
is a rigid velocity-
field
u
i
on Supp.'
i
/, there holds Œ
u
ı
D
Such a ı exists if
B
u
i
D
u
on Supp.
i
/. Moreover as Œ
u
ı
2
L
1
.0;T I C
loc
.
R
d
//,theflowt 7!
M
t
i
associated with Œ
u
ı
is well defined and
i
/ is an open connected subset of ,forall
i 2f1;:::;ng and the difficulty is overcome.
Finally, once it is obtained that the body domain
t
i
.
lipschitzian. In particular
B
i
.t/ D
M
B
.t/ is made of n rigid bodies,
it is classical to show that if
u
is smooth in the remaining fluid domain and
satisfies (
4.32
), then there exists a pressure p so that (
4.9
) holds true in a classical
sense. As long as no contact occurs and the solid boundaries are smooth, it is
also possible to lift any set of rigid velocities on the
S
B
i
.t/'s into a test-function
w
Q
S
; in order to prove that (
4.12
)and(
4.13
) are also satisfied with
i
and !
i
computed w.r.t.
u
j
B
i
.t/
. If the body boundaries and container boundary are
smooth, we might also apply trace arguments to recover (
4.10
)-(
4.11
).
We proceed with detailing the construction of weak solutions. As classical, the
main points in such constructions are
2
K
Œ
(i)
Definition of approximate problems;
(ii)
Existence of solutions to the approximate problems;
Search WWH ::
Custom Search