Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Now because of the uniform convergence (
2.169
) of the sequence .
t
N
/
N
2N
,
and the uniform boundedness of .k@
r
u
N
k
L
2
.
F
/
/
N
2N
, which is consequence of
Proposition
2.6
, we can take N
1
N
0
such that
Z
T
Z
2
<
"
.t/
\
t
N
.t/
j
u
N
N
u
N
j
2
;N N
1
:
0
This inequality, together with (
2.171
) proofs that
N
u
N
!
u
strongly in
L
2
..0;T/
max
/.
STEP 2.
We will now show that
N
r
u
N
*r
u
weakly in L
2
..0;T/
max
/:
First notice that from
r
u
N
t
N
u
N
Dr
t
N
u
N
/
N
2N
in L
2
..0;T/
F
/, established
in Proposition
2.6
, we get that the sequence .
N
and from uniform boundedness of .r
r
u
N
/
N
2N
converges weakly in
L
2
..0;T/
max
/. Let us denote the weak limit of .
N
G
. Therefore,
r
u
N
/
N
2N
by
Z
T
Z
Z
T
Z
G
D
N
r
u
N
; 2 C
c
..0;T/
max
/:
lim
N
!1
0
max
0
max
We want to show that
G
D r
u
.
For this purpose, we first consider the set .
max
n
.t// and show that
G
D 0
there, and then the set
.t/ and show that
G
Dr
u
there.
Let be a test function such that supp .0;T/
max
n
.t/
.Usingthe
uniform convergence of the sequence
t
N
, obtained in (
2.169
), there exists an N
such that
N
.
x
/ D 0, N N
,
x
2 supp. Therefore, we have
Z
T
Z
Z
T
Z
G
D
N
r
u
N
lim
N
!1
D 0:
0
max
0
max
max
n
.t/
.
Now, let us take a test function such that supp .0;T/
.t/. Again using
the same argument as before, as well as the uniform convergence of the sequence
t
N
, obtained in (
2.169
), we conclude that there exists an N
such that
N
.
x
/ D
1, N N
,
x
2 supp . Therefore, we have
Z
T
G
D 0 on .0;T/
Thus,
Z
Z
T
Z
Z
T
Z
G
D
N
r
u
N
.t/
r
u
N
lim
N
!1
D
lim
N
!1
:
0
max
0
max
0
From the strong convergence
N
u
N
!
u
obtained in STEP 1, we have that on the
set supp ,
u
N
!
u
in the sense of distributions, and so, on the same set supp ,
Search WWH ::
Custom Search