Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Now because of the uniform convergence ( 2.169 ) of the sequence . t N / N 2N ,
and the uniform boundedness of .k@ r u N k L 2 . F / / N 2N , which is consequence of
Proposition 2.6 , we can take N 1 N 0 such that
Z T
Z
2 < "
.t/ \ t N .t/ j u N
N u N
j
2 ;N N 1 :
0
This inequality, together with ( 2.171 ) proofs that N u N
! u strongly in
L 2 ..0;T/ max /.
STEP 2.
We will now show that N
r u N *r u weakly in L 2 ..0;T/ max /:
First notice that from
r u N
t N u N
Dr
t N u N / N 2N in L 2 ..0;T/ F /, established
in Proposition 2.6 , we get that the sequence . N
and from uniform boundedness of .r
r u N / N 2N converges weakly in
L 2 ..0;T/ max /. Let us denote the weak limit of . N
G . Therefore,
r u N / N 2N by
Z T
Z
Z T
Z
G D
N
r u N
; 2 C c ..0;T/ max /:
lim
N !1
0
max
0
max
We want to show that G D r u .
For this purpose, we first consider the set . max n .t// and show that
G
D 0
there, and then the set .t/ and show that G Dr u there.
Let be a test function such that supp .0;T/
max n .t/ .Usingthe
uniform convergence of the sequence t N , obtained in ( 2.169 ), there exists an N
such that N . x / D 0, N N , x 2 supp. Therefore, we have
Z T
Z
Z T
Z
G D
N
r u N
lim
N !1
D 0:
0
max
0
max
max n .t/ .
Now, let us take a test function such that supp .0;T/ .t/. Again using
the same argument as before, as well as the uniform convergence of the sequence
t N , obtained in ( 2.169 ), we conclude that there exists an N such that N . x / D
1, N N , x 2 supp . Therefore, we have
Z T
G D 0 on .0;T/
Thus,
Z
Z T
Z
Z T
Z
G D
N
r u N
.t/ r u N
lim
N !1
D
lim
N !1
:
0
max
0
max
0
From the strong convergence N u N
! u obtained in STEP 1, we have that on the
set supp , u N
! u in the sense of distributions, and so, on the same set supp ,
Search WWH ::




Custom Search