Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
FIGURE 12.18
The distri-
bution of the
RV
for the model
and 10 000 randomly selected
alternative subdivisions of the
mandible into two parts hav-
ing the same numbers of land-
marks within each partition as
contained in the model.
TABLE 12.5
Results of the Minimum Deviance Method for the Four Models of Mandibular Modularity
Shown in
Figure 12.16
Hypothesis
γ
*
p-Value
Rank
Jackknife Support
Null
0
0
5
100%
Front/Back
0.2628
1
4
100%
2
Satb2
0.2909
1
3
100%
2
Satb2
/Gsc
0.3217
0.999
2
100%
2
Condensation
0.3522
0.388
1
100%
2
γ
Shown are the measures of deviance scaled by the number of fixed parameters,
*, p-values for the null hypothesis that the
difference between the modeled and observed covariance matrices is no greater than expected by chance, the ranks of the four
models (with 1 being the best fitting and 5 being the worst fitting) and the jackknife support for the ranks.