Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology and Molecular Medicine.
vol. 6. Germany: VCH Publisher Weinheim; 1997. p. 302
[86] Gresham D, et al. The repertoire and dynamics of evolutionary
adaptations to controlled nutrient-limited environments in yeast.
PLoS Genet 2008;4:e1000303.
[87] K¨ppeli O. Regulation of carbon metabolism in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae
25.
[64] Sherman F. Getting started with yeast. Modified from Methods
[65] Lehninger AL. Biochemistry. second ed. New York: Worth
Publishers; 1975.
[66] Fell DA. Understanding the Control of Metabolism. London:
Portland Press; 1997.
[67] Feldmann H. Yeast: Molecular and Cell Biology. Wiley-VCH;
2010.
[68] Stansfield I, Stark MJ. Yeast Gene Analysis. second ed. London:
Academic Press; 2007.
[69] Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H, et al. Life with 6000 genes.
Science 1996;274(546):563
e
7.
[70] Ramanathan A, Schreiber SL. Multilevel regulation of growth rate
in yeast revealed using systems biology. J Biol 2007;6:3.
[71] Kell DB, Oliver SG. Here is the evidence, now what is the
hypothesis? The complementary roles of inductive and hypoth-
esis-driven
e
and
related
yeasts. Adv Microb
Physiol
1986;28:181
e
209.
[88] K¨ppeli O, Gschwend-Petrik M, Fiechter A. Transient responses of
Saccharomyces uvarum to a change of the growth-limiting nutrient
in continuous culture. J Gen Microbiol 1985;131:47
e
52.
[89] Petrik M, K¨ppeli O, Fiechter A. An expanded concept for the
glucose effect in the yeast Saccharomyces uvarum: involvement of
short- and long-term regulation. J Gen Microbiol 1983;129:43
e
9.
[90] van den Brink J, Daran-Lapujade P, Pronk JT. de Winde JH. New
insights into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation switch:
dynamic transcriptional response to anaerobicity and glucose-
excess. BMC Genomics 2008;9:100.
[91] Rintala E, Jouhten P, Toivari M, Wiebe MG, Maaheimo H,
Penttil¨ M, et al. Transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae to shift from respiratory and respirofermentative to fully
fermentative metabolism. OMICS 2011;15 (7
e
8):461
e
76.
[92] Bull AT. The renaissance of continuous culture in the post-
genomics age. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2010;37:993
e
1021.
PubMed PMID: 20835748.
[93] Dikicioglu D, et al. How yeast re-programmes its transcriptional
profile in response to different nutrient impulses. BMC Syst Biol.
2011;5:148.
[94] Winder CL. Lanthaler K. The use of continuous culture in systems
biology investigations. Methods Enzymol 2011;500:261
e
75.
[95] Jameson D, Verma M, Westerhoof HV. Methods Enzymol, 500.
London: Academic Press; 2011.
[96] Almaas E. Biological impacts and context of network theory.
J Exp Biol 2007;210(Pt 9):1548
e
58.
[97] Emmert-Streib F, Dehmer M. Networks for systems biology:
conceptual connection of data and function.
science
in
the
post-genomic
era. Bioessays
2004;26:99
e
105.
[72] Cohen J, Medley G. Stop Working and Start Thinking. second ed.
New York: Garland Science, Taylor and Francis Group; 2005.
[73] Teitelman R. On the genome, the markets and data. The Deal
Economy 2012. The Deal Pipeline,
http://www.thedeal.com/
[74] Balaji S, et al. Comprehensive analysis of combinatorial regula-
tion using the transcriptional regulatory network of yeast. J Mol
Biol 2006;360:213
e
27.
[75] Luscombe NM, et al. Genomic analysis of regulatory network
dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature 2004;431:
308
e
12.
[76] Davies J. Regulation, necessity, and the misinterpretation of
knockouts. Bioessays 2009;31:826
e
30.
[77] DeLuna A, Springer M, Kirschner MW, Kishony R. Need-based
up-regulation of protein levels in response to deletion of their
duplicate genes. PLoS Biol 2010;8:e1000347.
[78] Gout JF, Kahn D, Duret L. Paramecium post-genomics consor-
tium. The relationship among gene expression, the evolution of
gene dosage, and the rate of protein evolution. PLoS Genet
2010;6:e1000944.
[79] Pronk JT. Auxotrophic yeast strains in fundamental and applied
research. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002;68:2095
e
100.
[80] Ferenci T. Regulation by nutrient limitation. Curr Opin Microbiol
1999;2(2):208
e
13.
[81] Fiechter A, Kappeli 0, Meussdorfer F. Batch and continuous
culture. In: Rose A, Harrison JS, editors. The Yeasts, vol. 2.
London: Academic Press; 1987. p. 99
e
129.
[82] Fiechter A. Continuous cultivation of yeasts. Methods Cell Biol
1975;11:97
IET Syst Biol
2011;5(3):185
e
207.
[98] Kim H, Hu W, et al. Unraveling condition specific gene tran-
scriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:165.
[99] Kim TY, Kim HU, et al. Data integration and analysis of bio-
logical networks. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2010;21:78
e
84.
[100] Liu YY, Slotine JJ, Barab
´
si AL. Controllability of complex
networks. Nature 2011;473:167
e
73.
[101] Cagney, G, Emili, A, editors. Network Biology. Methods and
Applications. Methods in Molecular Biology (MiMB Series.
Editor-in-chief. Prof. John M. Walker). vol. 781. New York:
Humana Press, Springer; 2011. ISBN 978
e
1-61779
e
275
e
5.
[102] Lee JM, Gianchandani EP, et al. Dynamic analysis of integrated
signaling, metabolic, and regulatory networks. PLoS Comput Biol
2008;4(5):e1000086.
130.
[83] Kubitschek HE. Introduction to Research with Continuous
Cultures. Prentice hall biological techniques series. New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs; 1970.
[84] Hayes A, et al. Hybridization array technology coupled with
chemostat culture: tools to interrogate gene expression in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods 2002;26:281
e
90.
[85] Weusthuis RA, et al. Chemostat cultivation as a tool for studies on
sugar transport in yeasts. Microbiol Rev 1994;58:616
e
30.
[103]
Ideker T, Thorsson V, et al. Integrated genomic and proteomic
analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science
2001;292(5518):929
e
34.
e
[104]
Ideker T, Thorsson V, et al. Testing for differentially-expressed
genes by maximum-likelihood analysis of microarray data. J
Comput Biol 2000;7(6):805
e
17.
[105]
Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, et al. Exploration, normalization, and
summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data.
Biostatistics 2003;4(2):249
e
64.
