Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
Inputs
Activities
Outputs
Intermediate Outcomes
End Outcomes
Planning inputs:
1. Child labor
2. Minority populations
3. Logging
4. Fishing
1. Child labor
v Publications included in CAIS
v Meetings and conferences
v Testimony to ESA
v Department of Labor use of
HOs
v Safe areas for children
1. Child labor
v Childhood injury and
prevention
v Use of data/information for
other programs, such as Farm
Safety 4 Just Kids and the
National Safe Kids Campaign
v Citation of 10 of the HOs
v Use of 4 HOs for regulatory
action
1. General and work-related
decrease in number of injured
youths
1. Child labor
v Surveillance
v Hazardous orders (HOs)
v Research
v Partnerships and extramural
activities
2. Decline of fatalities and
occupational injury and illness
associated with logging
Production Inputs:
1. Budget
2. Staff
3. Facilities
4. Management structure
5. Extramural entities
6. Partners
2. Minority populations
v Varied degrees of research and
outreach activities
v Hispanic/Latino and African-
American farmers
v Panels on hired farm workers
v Collaborations and partnerships
with other agencies including
CES
v Farm operators
v Information sharing
2. Minority populations
v Hired farmworker survey
v Partnerships for dissemination
of survey results
v Peer-review publications
v Outreach publications
3. Impressive reduction of fatalities
in commercial fishing
2. Migrant
v Positive testimonials from
pesticide training
3. Logging
v Peer-review publications
v Conferences and public
testimonies
3. Logging
v Workshops
v Participation in inter-agency
prevention programs
v Training of Mexican MDs
through FACE
v Expansion of FACE to different
states
v Training on accident
investigation
3. Logging
vHelicopter-related deaths
vNational logging standards
vROPS and FOPS
vFACE
vMechanical harvesting
4. Fishing
v Peer-review publications
v Fishing vessel safety
conferences and workshops
v Decline in the fatality rate
v Lobster fisheries
v Deck safety
v Full-time equivalents
4. Fishing
v Preseason dockside inspection
v Marine safety training
v Technical assistance for fishery
management
4. Fishing
vAlaska Field Station
vSurveillance
vFatality reduction
vPartnerships
v Unclear definitions of populations at risk used by different agencies
v Lack of child labor laws
v Poor surveillance and reliance on outside sources of data
v Poor understanding of the scope and cost of AFF studies
v Indecisions regarding long-term support of different projects
v Regulatory environment
External Factors
FIGURE 5-1 Priority populations at risk research logic submodel.
CAIS = Child Agricultural Injury Survey, CES = Cooperative Extension Service, ESA = Employment Standards Administration, FACE = Fatality
Assessment and Control Evaluation, FOPS = falling object protective structure, ROPS = rollover protective structure.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search