Permeable Reactive Barriers: Cost-Effective and Sustainable Remediation of Groundwater - Permeable Reactive Barrier: Sustainable Groundwater Remediation - page 21

Guerin T.F., Horner S., Mc Govern T., Davey B. 2002. An application of permeable reac-
tive barrier technology to petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated groundwater.
Water Research 36:15-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00233-0.
Haggerty G.M., Bowman R.S. 1994. Sorption of chromate and other inorganic anions
by organo-zeolite. Environmental Science & Technology 28:452-458.
Han I., Schlautman M.A., Batchelor B. 2000. Removal of hexavalent chromium from
groundwater by granular activated carbon. Water Environment Research 72(1):
29-39, Water Environment Federation.
Henderson A.D., Demond A.H. 2007. Long-term performance of zero-valent iron
permeable reactive barriers: A critical review. Environmental Engineering Science
24:401-423.
Huttenloch P., Roehl K.E., Czurda K. 2003. Use of copper shaving store move mer-
cury from contaminated groundwater or waste water by amalgamation.
Environmental Science & Technology 37:4269-4273. DOI:10.1021/es020237q.
Hyman M., Dupont R.R. 2001. Groundwater and Soil Remediation: Process Design and
Cost Estimating of Proven Technologies . ASCE Publications, Reston, VA. Doi:
10.1061/9780784404270.
ITRC. 2011. Permeable Reactive Barrier: Technology Update, The Interstate
Technology & Regulatory Council PRB: Technology Update Team. Washington,
DC. http:// www. itrcweb. org/ Guidance/GetDocument? documentID=69.
Joo S.H., Feitz A.J., Waite T.D. 2004. Oxidative degradation of the carbothioate her-
bicide, molinate, using nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environmental Science &
Technology 38:2242-2247. DOI:10.1021/es035157g.
Khan F.I., Husain T., Hejazi R. 2004. An overview and analysis of site remediation
technologies. Journal of Environmental Management 71:95-122. DOI:http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.02.003.
Leeson A., Stroo H.F., Johnson P.C. 2013. Groundwater remediation today and chal-
lenges and opportunities for the future. Groundwater 51:175-179. DOI:10.1111/
gwat.12039.
Leyva A.G., Marrero J., Smichowski P., Cicerone D. 2001. Sorption of antimony on to
hydroxyapatite. Environmental Science and Technology 35:3669-3675.
Li Z., Roy S.J., Zou Y., Bowman R.S. 1998. Long-term chemical and biological stability
of surfactant-modified zeolite. Environmental Science & Technology 32:2628-2632.
Liang L., Sullivan A.B., West O.R., Moline G.R., Kamolpornwijit W. 2003. Predicting
the precipitation of mineral phases in permeable reactive barriers. Environmental
Engineering Science 20:635-653.
McLaughlan R., Merrick N., Davis G.B. 2006. Natural attenuation: A scoping review,
CRCCARE Technical Report no. 2, CRC for Contamination Assessment and
Remediation of the Environment, Adelaide, Australia.
Meggyes T., Simon F.-G. 2000. Removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from
groundwater using permeable reactive barriers. Land Contamination &
Reclamation 8:3.
Meza I. 2009. The use of PRBs (permeable reactive barriers) for attenuation of cad-
mium and hexavalent chromium from industrial contaminated soil. Thesis sub-
mitted to the Graduate School, Ball State University.
Naidu R. 1996. Contaminants and the soil environment in the Australasia-Paciic
region. Proceedings of the First Australasia-Pacific Conference on Contaminants
and Soil Environment in the Australasia-Pacific Region, heldin Adelaide, Australia,
February 18-23, 1996, 1st Australasia-Pacific Conference on Contaminants and