Permeable Reactive Barriers: Cost-Effective and Sustainable Remediation of Groundwater - Permeable Reactive Barrier: Sustainable Groundwater Remediation - page 20

Blowes D.W., Ptacek C.J., Benner S.G., McRae C.W.T., Bennett T.A., Puls R.W. 2000.
Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers. Journal
of Contaminant Hydrology 45:123-137.
CEI. 2005. Soil remediation technologies: Assessment, clean-up, decommissioning,
rehabilitation. Canadian Environmental Industries (Energy and Environmental
Industries Branch), available at: http:// www. ic. gc. ca/ eic/site/ea-ae.nsf/

eng/ ea02201. html.
Chadalavada S., Datta B., Naidu R. 2011. Uncertainty based optimal monitoring net-
work design for a chlorinated hydrocarbon contaminated site. Environmental
Monitoring and Assessment , 173:929-940.
Cundy A.B., Hopkinson L., Whitby R.L.D. 2008. Use of iron-based technologies in
contaminated land and ground water remediation: A review. Science of the Total
Environment 400:42-51. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.002.
Davis G.B., Merrick N., Mc Laughlan R. 2006. Protocols and techniques for charac-
terising sites with subsurface petroleum hydrocarbons—A review, CRCCARE
Technical Report no. 2, CRC for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of
the Environment, Adelaide, Australia.
DuTeaux S.B. 1996. A Compendium of Cost Data for Environmental Remediation Technologies .
United States. Department of Energy. Office of Science Technology. Los Alamos
National Laboratory.
FRTR. 1998. Guide to documenting and managing cost and performance information
for remediation projects. Prepared by members agencies of the federal remedia-
tion technology roundtable (FRTR), www.frtr.gov, EPA 542-B-98-007.
FRTR. 2007a. Electronically induced Redox Barriers. Federal Remediation
Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, Washington, DC http://costperformance
.org/proile.cfm?ID=403&CaseID=403.
FRTR. 2007b. In Situ Chemical Oxidation, Soil Vapor Extraction, and in situ Bio-
Stimulation at Hanner's Dry Cleaners, Pompano Beach, Florida . Federal Remediation
Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, Washington, DC. http://costperformance
.org/proile.cfm?ID=408&CaseID=406.
FRTR. 2007c. Permeable Reactive Barrier. Federal Remediation Technologies
Roundtable. USEPA, Washington, DC. http://costperformance.org/profile
.cfm?ID=395&CaseID=395.
FRTR. 2008. Bioaugmentation. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA,
Washington, DC. http://costperformance.org/ proile.cfm?ID=424&CaseID=422.
FRTR. 2011. Bioaugmentation. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA,
Washington, DC. http://costperformance.org/proile.cfm?ID=408&CaseID=406.
Gillham R.W., O'Hannesin S.F. 1992. Metal-catalysed abiotic degradation of
halogenated organic compounds. Univ., Waterloo Centre for Groundwater
Research.
Gillham R.W., O'Hannesin S.F. 1994. Enhanced degradation of halogenated aliphatics
by zero-valent iron. Groundwater 32:958-967.
Golab A.N., Peterson M., Indraratna B. 2006. Selection of potential reactive materi-
als for a permeable reactive barrier for remediating acidic groundwater in acid
sulphate soil terrains. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
39:209-223.
Gu B., Watson D.B., Wu L., Phillips D.H., White D.C., Zhou J. 2002. Microbiological
characteristics in a zero-valent iron reactive barrier. Environmental Monitoring
and Assessment 77:293-309.