Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
P bulb = 900 W, where the blade settings are defi ned as shown in Fig. 28 at the
blade tips. The rear wind rotor never counter-rotates against the front wind rotor
at the lower wind velocity V because not only the rear wind rotor cannot generate
the suffi ciently counter-rotational torque T R corresponding to T F of the front wind
rotor but also the outer armature pulls the inner armature by the magnetic force.
With the increase of the wind velocity, the rear wind rotor with b R larger than 20°
begins to counter-rotate successfully. On the contrary, the rear wind rotor with b R =
10° never change the rotational direction and is in the blowing mode because the
rear blade with the excessively larger angle of attack cannot generate the fruitful
counter-rotational torque due to the fl ow stall on larger scale. Judging from the
counter-rotation expected to this type unit, the rear wind rotor with b R = 20° may
be acceptable within the measured data.
Figure 29 shows the effect of the bulb load on the operating conditions at the blade
setting angles b F = b R = 20°. The load P bulb affects obviously the rotational speed of
Rear Rotor
b F
Wind direction
b R
Front Rotor
Figure 28: Blade setting angles.
90
6
P bulb
b F =20deg.
b R =20deg.
60
423
1023
60
4
P bulb
60
423
1023
30
2
0
0
750
600
N F
300
600
P bulb
N F
N R
P bulb
60
423
1023
0
450
60
423
1023
-300
300
b F =20deg.
b R =20deg.
-600
150
N R
-900
0
0
5
10
15
20
0
5
10
15
20
V m/s
V m/s
Figure 29: Effect of the bulb load on the operation conditions.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search