Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
according to C3 . In other words, g is bounded above. Therefore, we can apply
Lemma 4.2 and obtain
n
n
lim
n ₒ∞
lim
j ₒ∞
f ( i , j )
=
lim
j ₒ∞
lim
n ₒ∞
f ( i , j ) .
(4.3)
i = 0
i = 0
For any j
∈ N
, the sequence
{
g ( n , j )
} n 0 is nondecreasing and bounded, so its limit
i = 0 f ( i , j ) exists. That is,
n
lim
n ₒ∞
f ( i , j )
=
f ( i , j ) .
(4.4)
i = 0
i = 0
, the limit lim j ₒ∞ i = 0 f ( i , j )
In view of C2 , we have that for any given n
∈ N
exists and
n
n
lim
j ₒ∞
f ( i , j )
=
lim
j ₒ∞
f ( i , j ) .
(4.5)
i =
0
i =
0
By C3 , the sequence
{
S n } n 0 is bounded. Since it is also nondecreasing, it converges
to
lim
j ₒ∞
f ( i , j ). That is,
i =
0
n
lim
n ₒ∞
lim
j ₒ∞
f ( i , j )
=
lim
j ₒ∞
f ( i , j ) .
(4.6)
i
=
0
i
=
0
Hence the left-hand side of the desired equality exists. By combining ( 4.3 )-( 4.6 ),
we obtain the result,
lim
j ₒ∞
f ( i , j )
=
lim
j ₒ∞
f ( i , j ).
i = 0
i = 0
Proposition 4.3 (Bounded Continuity—General Function) Let f :
N × N ₒ R
be a function that satisfies the following conditions
C1. j 1
j 2 implies
|
f ( i , j 1 )
|≤|
f ( i , j 2 )
|
for all i , j 1 , j 2 ∈ N
;
C2. for any i
∈ N
, the limit lim j ₒ∞ |
f ( i , j )
|
exists;
C3. the partial sums S n = i = 0 lim j ₒ∞ |
f ( i , j )
|
are bounded, i.e. there exists
some c
∈ R 0 such that S n
c, for all n
0 ;
C4. for all i , j 1 , j 2 ∈ N
j 2 and f ( i , j 1 ) > 0 , then f ( i , j 2 ) > 0 .
Then the following equality holds:
,ifj 1
lim
j ₒ∞
f ( i , j )
=
lim
j ₒ∞
f ( i , j ) .
i
=
0
i
=
0
Proof
By Proposition 4.2 and conditions C1 , C2 and C3 , we infer that
lim
j ₒ∞
i = 0 |
f ( i , j )
|=
j ₒ∞ |
lim
f ( i , j )
|
.
(4.7)
Search WWH ::




Custom Search