Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Chapter 7
Weak Probabilistic Bisimulation
Abstract By taking the symmetric form of simulation preorder, we obtain a notion of
weak probabilistic bisimulation. It provides a sound and complete proof methodology
for an extensional behavioural equivalence, a probabilistic variant of the traditional
reduction barbed congruence.
Keywords
Weak probabilistic bisimulation
·
Reduction barbed congruence
·
Compositionality
7.1
Introduction
In Sect. 6.8, we have considered simulation preorder. By taking the symmetric form
of Definition 6.28 we easily obtain a notion of weak probabilistic bisimulation.
Definition 7.1 (Weak Probabilistic Bisimulation) Let S be the set of states in a
probabilistic labelled transitional system (pLTS). A relation
R D
( S )
× D
( S )is
a weak (probabilistic) bisimulation if ʔ
R
ʘ implies, for each ʱ
Act ˄ and all finite
satisfying i I p i =
sets of probabilities
{
p i |
i
I
}
1,
i I p i ·
ʱ
(i)
whenever ʔ
ʔ i , for any distributions ʔ i , there are some
i I p i ·
ʱ
distributions ʘ i with ʘ
ʘ i , such that ʔ i R
ʘ i for each i
I ;
i I p i ·
ʱ
(ii)
symmetrically, whenever ʘ
ʘ i , for any distributions ʘ i , there
i I p i ·
ʱ
are some distributions ʔ i with ʔ
ʔ i , such that ʔ i R
ʘ i for each
i
I .
The largest weak probabilistic bisimulation, which is guaranteed to exist using
standard arguments, is called weak probabilistic bisimilarity and denoted by
.
is an equivalence relation. Moreover, it turns out that
this provides a sound and complete proof methodology for a natural extensional
behavioural equivalence between probabilistic systems, a generalisation of reduction
barbed congruence , the well-known behavioural equivalence for a large variety of
process description languages. Intuitively, reduction barbed congruence is defined
to be the coarsest relation that
It is easy to see that
• s compositional ; that is preserved by some natural operators for constructing
systems
Search WWH ::




Custom Search