Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 1.14
Types and parameters for the underlying distributions of (Y
1
, Y
2
, Y
3
)
Distribution parameters
Random variable
Soil parameter
Distribution type
a
X
b
X
a
Y
b
Y
Y
1
LI
SU
1.434
−
1.068
0.629
0.358
Y
2
SU
4.495
1.199
ln(
σ′
p
/
P
a
)
−
9.572
−
4.481
Y
3
ln(
S
t
)
SU
2.453
1.888
0.343
−
2.233
random seed initialized by randn('state', 13). The underlying marginal distributions for (Y
1
,
Y
2
, Y
3
) are Johnson SU, and the underlying
C
matrix is
1 0 57 059
0571005
059005
−
.
.
C
=
−
.
.
(1.101)
.
.
1
realistic clay parameters: Y
1
represents LI, Y
2
represents the logarithm of the normalized
preconsolidation stress ln
(
σ
p
P
/
(P
a
is one atmosphere pressure), and Y
3
represents the
observed in the Clay/10/7490 database (Ching and Phoon 2014a). Hence, although the data
are simulated, they are realistic rather than mathematically contrived with no relation to
geotechnical engineering data. Ching et al. (2014a) called data simulated from a realistic
geotechnical engineering context as “virtual site” data. It is significant that nonlinear cor-
relation trends are observed among the simulated data points. Namely, (Y
1
, Y
2
, Y
3
) are mul-
the histograms of the simulated (Y
1
, Y
2
, Y
3
) data.
Given the simulated (Y
1
, Y
2
, Y
3
) data, the procedure described in Section 1.5.3 is used
to identify the types and parameters for the Johnson distribution. The identified types
and parameters are given in the parentheses in
Table 1.15
.
This table should be compared
to
Table 1.14
. Note that
Table 1.14
is the exact solution while
Table 1.15
is the estimated
′
)
500
250
250
400
200
200
300
150
150
200
100
100
100
50
50
0
0
0
0
2
4
-2
0
2
4
0
2
4
6
Y
1
= LI
Y
2
= ln(σ′
p
/
P
a
)
Y
3
= ln(
S
t
)
Figure 1.26
Histograms of the simulated non-normal (Y
1
, Y
2
, Y
3
) data. The solid lines are the fitted Johnson
distributions.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search