Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
in which P ( x i |E ) is the occurrence probability of a toe debris with thickness x i and
P ( F|x i ) is the probability of unsatisfactory performance of the pile with the given toe debris.
Similarly, if toe debris does exist and x is taken to be a continuous variable, its probability
distribution can be expressed as f ( x|t ) in which the parameter, t , is the mean of x and treated
as another random variable with a probability distribution f ( t ). The conditional probability
of unsatisfactory performance of the pile can be further given by
x
t
U
U
PF E
(|)
=
P Fx
( |)
fxtftt x
(|)()
dd
(14.17)
x
t
L
L
where x L and x U are the lower and upper bounds of x and t L and t U are the lower and upper
bounds of t , respectively.
For a pile that is constructed without any integrity testing, the empirical occurrence prob-
ability of toe debris can be considered as a prior distribution of p d . The empirical perception
of toe debris thickness can also be used to establish the prior distribution of toe debris thick-
ness. A prior p f can then be calculated using Equation 14.15 . If field measurements from
interface coring are available, the distributions of p d and toe debris thickness can be updated
with the additional measurement information using the Bayesian approach (e.g., Ang and
Tang 2007), and P ( F | E ) of the pile with toe debris can be calculated using Equation 14.16 or
Equation 14.17 . Once the updated distribution of p d and the updated conditional reliability of
the pile with toe debris are available, the updated p f can be calculated using Equation 14.15 .
14.4.2 updating occurrence probability of toe debris
The Bayesian approach provides a method to combine empirical information and field obser-
vations. Take the occurrence probability of toe debris, p d , as an example. An initial PDF of
p d , f ′( p d ), can be established based on theoretical models or expert judgments. When field
observations of p d through on-site interface coring at a particular site are available, f ′( p d )
can be updated by combining the initial PDF with the field observations. The updated dis-
tribution can be regarded as a weighted average of the initial information and the additional
observations. More specifically, the updated PDF of p d , f ″( p d ), can be expressed as
fp
′′
()
=
KL Rp fp
(| )( )
(14.18)
d
d
d
where K is a normalization constant and L ( R | p d ) is the likelihood of observing the outcome R .
Suppose n piles are selected randomly from a site for inspection, and m of them are found to
contain toe debris. Since a thick toe debris, if present in a pile, can be detected with certainty in
most cases by interface coring, it is reasonable to assume that the detection probability of inter-
face coring is equal to one. If statistical independence among pile inspections is further assumed,
then the likelihood that the assumed event occurs can be expressed as a binomial function
n
m
=
m
nm
LR p
(| )
p
(
1
p
)
(14.19)
d
d
d
f ′( p d ) can be formulated based on available test data on toe debris. Since p d is bounded
between 0 and 1, it may be described by a beta distribution
1
(
q
1
)
(
r
1
)
fp
()
=
p
(
1
p
)
(14.20)
d
d
d
Bq r
(,)
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search