Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
Input
Given protein structure
P 1
P 2
P i
P N
A
Verify results from each predictor
Calculate the z-score value for each pocket
site in different predictors
Get the top 3 pocket sites from each
predictor
B
Clustering those 3
N pockets according to
their spatial similarity
×
Calculate the total z-score for each final
cluster
Rank the final clusters by their total z-score
Calculate the mass center for each cluster
Identify potential binding residues
(Residue mapping)
C
Prediction pocket sites (single point and clusters)
Prediction pocket sites from single methods
Potential ligand-binding residues for each pocket
Output
Fig. 2.3 The illustration of the workflow in metaPocket. Step A: calling each single method.
Step B: generating meta-pocket sites. Step C: mapping potential ligand-binding residues
Generating meta-pocket sites . After calling each method, metaPocket only
takes the first three pocket sites from each method into account. Thus, totally there
are 24 pocket sites and these pocket sites are somehow overlapped spatially. To
identify those overlapped pocket sites (we call them as “meta-pocket” sites), we use
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search