Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
extraordinary growth in theory, method and application since the “revolution,” and this is
expected to continue at a furious pace as biological anthropologists find ever more innovative
ways to apply geometric morphometrics to studies of human variation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank the editors of the volume for their insightful comments and
suggestions that assisted in the production of this chapter. We appreciate the contributions
of Elizabeth Agosto to the case study presented and the programming assistance provided
by Patrick McKeown. Thanks are due to Roselyn Campbell for the photographs used in
this chapter and to Jonathan Bethard for his assistance with figure formatting. Funds for
the purchase of the three-dimensional digitizer utilized to collect the data employed in the
case study were provided by the William M. Bass III Endowment and the Office of Research
at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville.
REFERENCES
Adams, D.C., Rohlf, F.J., Slice, D.E., 2004. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the “revolu-
tion”. Italian Journal of Zoology 71, 5
e
16.
Afifi, A.A., Clark, V., 1996. Computer-aided Multivariate Analysis. Chapman & Hall, London.
Aldridge, K., Boyadjiev, S.A., Capone, G.T., DeLeon, V.B., Richtsmeier, J.T., 2005. Precision and error of three-
dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images. American Journal of Medical
Genetics 138A, 247
e
253.
Bastir, M., Rosas, A., Stringer, C.B., Cuetara, J.M., Kruszynski, R., Weber, G.W., Ross, C.F., Ravosa, M.J., 2010. Effects
of brain and facial size on basicranial form in human and primate evolution. Journal of Human Evolution 58,
424
e
431.
Bigoni, L., Velem
´
nsk
´
, J., Br
zek, J., 2010. Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of cranio-facial
sexual dimorphism in a Central European sample of known sex. Homo 61 (1), 16
e
32.
Bookstein, F.L., 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. University of Cambridge Press, London.
Bookstein, F., Schafer, K., Prossinger, H., Seidler, H., Fieder, M., Stringer, C., Weber, G.W., Arsuaga, J.L., Slice, D.E.,
Rohlf, F.J., Recheis, W., Mariam, A.J., Marcus, L.F., 1999. Comparing frontal cranial profiles in archaic and
modern Homo by morphometric analysis. Anatomical Record 257, 217
e
224.
Bookstein, F.L., Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, H., Prossinger, K., Schaefer, K., Seidler, H., 2003. Cranial integration in
Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution. Journal of Human
Evolution 44 (2), 167
e
187.
Buck, T.J., Strand Viðarsd´ ttir, U., 2004. A proposed method for the identification of race in sub-adult skeletons:
a geometric morphometric analysis of mandibular morphology. Journal of Forensic Sciences 49 (6), 1
e
6.
Buikstra, J.E., Ubelaker, D.H., 1994. Standards for data collection from human skeletal material: Proceedings of
a seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History. Arkansas Archaeological Survey, Fayetteville, AR.
Buikstra, J.E., Frankenburg, S.R., Konigsberg, L.W., 1990. Skeletal biological distance studies in American physical
anthropology: Recent trends. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 82 (1), 1
e
7.
Bytheway, J.A., Ross, A.H., 2010. A geometric morphometric approach to sex determination of the human adult os
coxa. Journal of Forensic Sciences 55 (4), 859
e
864.
Claude, J. (2008). Morphometrics with R. Springer, New York.
Christensen, A.M., 2005. Assessing the variation in individual frontal sinus outlines. American Journal of Physical
Anthropology 127 (3), 291
e
295.
Corner, B.D., Lele, S., Richtsmeier, J.T., 1992. Measuring precision of three-dimensional landmark data. American
Journal of Physical Anthropology 3, 347
e
359.
u
