Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
(
)
(
) =
(
)
(
) =
(
)
(
) =∅ .
Cons
P
Hyp
P
Cons
P
Sp
P
Hyp
P
Sp
P
Notice that
Consequences follow (in the partial order
)from
μ
: all the premises explain
the consequences .
Hypotheses explain all the premises , since
˃<μ μ i , all the premises follow
from each hypothesis.
Speculations, are the conjectures for which it is neither
μ ˃
, nor
˃<μ
.
With all that, processes,
P
˃
, with
˃
Conj
(
P
)
, is a guessing, or conjectural reasoning
P
˃
, with
˃
Cons
(
P
)
, is a deduction, or deductive reasoning
P
˃
, with
˃
Hyp
(
P
)
, is an abduction, or abductive reasoning
P
˃
, with
˃
Sp
(
P
)
, is an speculation, or speculative reasoning
Concerning this types of conclusive reasonings, it should be pointed out what follows.
1. The set Conj
(
P
)
is not always in A
= P 0 (
X
)
. Hence, it can't be taken as a set
of premises, it has not sense to consider Conj
(
Conj
(
P
))
,or Cons
(
Conj
(
P
))
.
2. If P
Q ,itis Conj
(
Q
)
Conj
(
P
)
, because if
˃
Conj
(
Q
)
,from Inf Q
˃ ,itis Inf P
˃ . Hence, if
Inf P ,if Inf Q
˃
Conj
(
Q
)
it is
˃
, and Conj is anti-monotonic.
3. The sets Hyp
Conj
(
P
)
(
P
)
and Sp
(
P
)
are not always in
P 0 (
X
)
. Hence, they can't be taken
as sets of premises.
4. If P
(
)
(
)
˃
(
)
μ 0 <˃ <
Inf Q
Q ,itis Hyp
Q
Hyp
P
, since
Hyp
Q
,or
Inf P . Hence, the operator Hyp is anti-monotonic.
5. Concerning the operator Sp, if P
implies
μ 0 <˃ <
Q it can be Sp
(
P
)
Sp
(
Q
)
, and Sp
(
Q
)
Sp
(
P
)
. Hence, Sp is a non-monotonic operator.
3.2 Reasoning with Conditionals: Representation
3.2.1 What is a Conditional?
A conditional is an statement of the form 'If a , then b '
:=
a
b , with two previous
statements a
,
b . For example, “If it is raining, then I take an umbrella”, where a
=
It is raining, b
I take an umbrella, or “If the food is well cooked and well served,
and the wine is of good quality, then the tip will be higher than usual”, wit a
=
=
The
food is well cooked and well served, and the wine is of good quality, b
=
The tip
will be higher than usual.
Notice that the first example is a crisp conditional, but the second is an impre-
cise one. In what follows we will take into account the representation of imprecise
conditionals of the type
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search