Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
·
Proof The operations min, and max are obviously idempotent. Let us show that if
·=
μ · ˃
(μ, ˃)
is idempotent, it must be
min. By Theorem 2.2.6 , it is always
min
,
and the idempotency of
·
implies
min
(μ, ˃) ·
min
(μ, ˃) =
min
(μ, ˃).
But min
(μ, ˃) μ,
min
(μ, ˃) ˃
, imply min
(μ, ˃) ·
min
(μ, ˃) μ · ˃
, that is
min
(μ, ˃) μ · ˃,
and, by Theorem 2.2.6 ,min
(μ, ˃) = μ · ˃
. A similar proof applies to
+
and max .
Theorem 2.2.8 (Absortion laws)
μ · + ˃) = μ
X
holds for all
μ, ˃ ∈[
0
,
1
]
⃔·=
min
X
μ + · ˃) = μ
holds for all
μ, ˃ ∈[
0
,
1
]
⃔+=
max
·=
(μ, μ + ˃) = μ
μ μ + ˃
Proof If
min, the formula min
does hold, since
.
μ · + ˃) = μ
˃ = μ 0 follows
μ · + μ 0 ) = μ · μ = μ
Provided it is always
, taking
,
that holds if and only if
·=
min. If
+=
max, the formula max
(μ, μ · ˃) = μ
does
hold since
μ · ˃ μ
. Provided it is always
μ + · ˃) = μ
, taking
˃ = μ 1 follows
μ + · μ 1 ) = μ + μ = μ
, that holds if and only if
+=
max.
(Duality, or De Morgan laws) Provided the complement
Theorem 2.2.9
is invo-
((μ )
= μ
X
X
lutive
= μ
, for all
μ ∈[
0
,
1
]
)
, the algebra of fuzzy sets
( [
0
,
1
]
,
, )
min
,
max
is a dual algebra.
Proof If is involutive, from
μ + ˃ = · ˃) it follows
μ
· ˃ = + ˃) since
μ + ˃ = μ + ˃ =
· ˃ ) , hence
+ ˃) = μ
· ˃ . The converse is proven in
the same way. And the two De Morgan laws
· ˃) = μ + ˃ , μ + ˃) = μ
· ˃
, ˃ )) , for all
result equivalent. Then, it is enough to prove max
(μ, ˃) = (
min
X . Since
μ, ˃
in
[
0
,
1
]
, ˃ ) μ ,
, ˃ ) ˃ ,
min
min
it follows
μ = μ (
, ˃ )) ,
˃ = ˃ (
, ˃ )) ,
min
min
and
, ˃ ))
max
(μ, ˃) (
min
(2.1)
On the other hand,
(μ, ˃)) μ
μ
(μ, ˃) (
max
max
Search WWH ::




Custom Search