Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
=
−
1
=
=[
,
]
P
For example, if
P
small
on
X
0
1
is with
(the reverse linear
=
−
1
=
=[
,
]
Q
order on the real line), and
Q
short
on
Y
0
10
is with
(also the
reverse linear order on the real line),
u
(
x
)
=
10
x
gives
−
1
−
1
•
x
y
⃔
10
x
10
y
Q
∩
−
Q
equal to the identity (=) on the real line. Then,
small
and
short
can be considered a pair of
u
-primary synonyms.
If
P
acts on
X
with an
∩
−
1
P
taking
P
and
L
−
degree
μ
P
,
Q
acts on
Y
and is a
u
-primary synonym
of
P
, from
u
−
1
y
1
)
P
u
−
1
u
−
1
u
−
1
y
1
Q
y
2
⃔
(
(
y
2
)
⃒
μ
P
(
(
y
1
))
μ
P
(
(
y
2
)),
it follows that
u
−
1
μ
Q
=
μ
P
ⓦ
is an
L
−
degree
for
Q
. In this situation it is
u
−
1
y
1
)
μ
P
u
−
1
y
1
μ
Q
y
2
⃔
(
(
y
2
),
or
x
1
μ
P
x
2
⃔
u
(
x
1
)
μ
Q
u
(
x
2
),
that are equivalent to
μ
Q
=
μ
P
ⓦ
(
×
).
u
u
For example, with the before mentioned predicates
short
and
small
,itis
μ
short
(
y
)
=
μ
small
(
y
/
10
)
for all
y
in
[
0
,
10
]
, and results
y
1
μ
Q
y
2
⃔
y
1
/
10
μ
P
y
2
/
10
.
Remark 1.4.4
Whenever
P
and
Q
are
u
-synonyms,
it
could
be
stated
that
“
P means Q
”.
Remark 1.4.5
The definition of
primary meaning
is just a formal one trying to
approach an important aspect of the meaning of linguistic predicates, when act-
ing on a given universe of discourse. The same can be said about the definition of
u
-primary synonyms with which it does not hold, in general, that a pair of linguistic
synonyms are necessarily
u
primary synonyms. Anyway, what can be said is that
Q
is a
migration
of
P
to the universe
Y
.
−
Remark 1.4.6
In some way, the current meaning of a predicate, the form in which it
is used today in the plane language, partially inherits its past meanings.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search