Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
the needs of the growing global population,
while continuing the tradition of environmental
sustainability. The beauty of consumer choice
within the developed world lies in the fact that
there is a market for every production system,
intensive or extensive, large-scale or small-scale,
conventional or alternative, with or without
technology use, providing it continues to adapt
to the economic, environmental and social
issues that together confer sustainability. In
order to fulfil the dietary requirements and
desires of the growing population it is essential
to improve productivity within all systems with-
out demonizing or idolatrizing particular sys-
tems or practices. In regions where food is readily
available, consumers are afforded the luxury of
making dietary choices, yet many developing
regions exist where the simple need for food
negates such concerns. The global livestock
industry must therefore identify system-specific
and region-specific sustainable practices to
ensure that dietary needs are met and environ-
mental sustainability improved without pre-
scription of a one-size-fits-all solution.
References
Bauman, D.E. and Capper, J.L. (2011) Future challenges and opportunities in animal nutrition. In:
Proceedings of 26th Southwest Nutrition & Management Conference , University of Arizona, Tempe,
Arizona.
Beauchemin, K.A., Janzen, H.H., Little, S.M., McAllister, T.A. and McGinn, S.M. (2011) Mitigation of green-
house gas emissions from beef production in western Canada - evaluation using farm-based life
cycle assessment. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166-167, 663-677.
Bruce, J.P., Frome, M., Haites, E., Janzen, H., Lal, R. and Pawtian, K. (1999) Carbon sequestration in soils.
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54, 382-389.
Capper, J.L. (2011a) The environmental impact of United States beef production: 1977 compared with
2007. Journal of Animal Science 89, 4249-4261.
Capper, J.L. (2011b) Replacing rose-tinted spectacles with a high-powered microscope: the historical vs.
modern carbon footprint of animal agriculture. Animal Frontiers 1, 26-32.
Capper, J.L. (2012) Is the grass always greener? Comparing resource use and carbon footprints of conven-
tional, natural and grass-fed beef production systems. Animals 2, 127-143.
Capper, J.L. and Cady, R.A. (2012) A comparison of the environmental impact of Jersey vs. Holstein milk
for cheese production. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 165-176.
Capper, J.L., CastaƱeda-GutiƩrrez, E., Cady, R.A. and Bauman, D.E. (2008) The environmental impact of
recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST) use in dairy production. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 9668-9673.
Capper, J.L., Cady, R.A. and Bauman, D.E. (2009) The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944
compared with 2007. Journal of Animal Science 87, 2160-2167.
Cederberg, C. and Mattsson, B. (2000) Life cycle assessment of milk production - a comparison of conven-
tional and organic farming. Journal of Cleaner Production 8, 49-60.
Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., Henriksson, M., Sund, V. and Davis, J. (2009) Greenhouse Gas Emissions
from Swedish Production of Meat, Milk and Eggs: 1990 and 2005 . Swedish Institute of Food &
Biotechnology, Gothenburg.
Clause, R. (2010) Organic Beef Profile. Available at: http://www.agmrc.org/commodities__products/live-
stock/beef/organic_beef_profile.cfm (accessed 2 May 2011).
CME Group (2011) Daily Livestock Report . CME Group, Chicago, Illinois.
Conant, R.T., Paustian, K. and Elliott, E.T. (2001) Grassland management and conversion into grassland:
effects on soil carbon. Ecological Applications 11, 343-355.
Crozier, J. and ZoBell, D.R. (2010) Residual Feed Intake as a Selection Tool . Utah State University
Cooperative Extension, Logan, Utah.
de Boer, I.J.M. (2003) Environmental impact assessment of conventional and organic milk production.
Livestock Production Science 80, 69-77.
de Vries, A. and de Boer, I.J.M. (2010) Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review
of life cycle assessments. Livestock Science 128, 1-11.
Drewnowski, A. (2010) The cost of US foods as related to their nutritive value. American Journal of Clinical
Nutrition 92, 1181-1188.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search