Stakeholder Groups in Computational Creativity Research and Practice - Computational Creativity Research: Towards Creative Machines - page 33

on culinary creativity [ 59 , 60 ]. Creative software will make great inventions and
make terrible mistakes in the future, and this will lead to a re-evaluation of humanity
as being the centre of the creativity universe. Managing stakeholder perceptions of
creativity in software will be paramount in making this transition as smooth and as
fruitful for society as possible.
Acknowledgments Some of the work presented here was originally explored in [ 38 , 47 ], and we
are very grateful to the organisers of the AISB 2014 symposium on Computing and Philosophy, and
the organisers of the 2014 International Conference on Computational Creativity. We wish to thank
the many researchers with whom we have discussed the views presented in this chapter, especially
our colleagues in the Computational Creativity group at Goldsmiths College. This research has
been funded by EPSRC grants EP/L00206X and EP/J004049, and with the financial support of the
Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) programme within the Seventh Framework Programme
for Research of the European Commission, under FET-Open Grant numbers: 611553 (COINVENT)
and 611560 (WHIM).
References
1. Locke, J.: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford University Press, Oxford
(1975)
2. Dennett, D.: Three kinds of intentional psychology. In: Perspectives in the Philosophy of
Language: A Concise Anthology, pp. 163-186. Broadview Press, Peterborough (2000)
3. Gallie, W.: Essentially Contested Concepts. Proc. Aristot. Soc. 56 , 167-198 (1956)
4. Gray, J.N.: On the contestability of social and political concepts. Polit. Theory 5 (3), 331 (1977)
5. Smith, K.: Mutually contested concepts and their standard general use. J. Class. Sociol. 2 (3),
329-343 (2002)
6. Plucker, J.A., Makel, M.C.: Assessment of creativity, The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity,
pp. 48-73 (2010)
7. Jones, J.: Santa bought me a Playstation. But it's still not art. The Guardian. 7th January (2014)
8. Stuart, K.: Video games and art: why does the media get it so wrong? The Guardian. 8th January
(2014)
9. Jordanous, A.K.: Evaluating Computational Creativity: A Standardised Procedure for Evalu-
ating Creative Systems and its Application. PhD thesis, Department of Informatics, University
of Sussex (2012)
10. Austin, J.L.: How to do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1975). The
William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955
11. Searle, J.: A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In: Günderson, K. (ed.) Language, Mind, and
Knowledge, vol. 7. University of Minnesota Press (1975)
12. Latour, B.: Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Open
University Press, Milton Keynes (1987)
13. Boden, M.A.: What is creativity? In: Boden, M.A. (ed.) Dimensions of Creativity, pp. 75-117.
MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
14. Boden, M.A.: The CreativeMind:Myths andMechanisms.Weidenfield andNicholson, London
(1990)
15. Cardoso, A., Veale, T., Wiggins, G.A.: Converging on the divergent: the history (and future)
of the international joint workshops in computational creativity. AI Mag. 30 (3), 15 (2009)
16. National Science Foundation, CreativeIT, Program Solicitation 09-572 http://www.nsf.gov/
pubs/2009/nsf09572/nsf09572.htm (2009)
17. The Seventh Framework Programme (2007-2013) of the European Union: Information and
Communication Technologies. http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/docs/ict-wp2013-10-7-2013-
with-cover-issn.pdf (2013)