Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
References
1. Alcalde, C., Burusco, A., Fuentes-Gonzlez, R.: A constructive method for the definition of
interval-valued fuzzy implication operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 153(2), 211-227 (2005)
2. Bedregal, B.R.C., Takahashi, A.: The best interval representations of t-norms and automor-
phisms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 157, 3220-3230 (2006)
3. Bedregal, B.R.C., et al.: On interval fuzzy S-implications. Information Sciences 180,
1373-1389 (2010)
4. Bedregal, B.R.C., Santiago, R.H.N.: Interval representations, Łukasiewicz implicators and
Smets-Magrez axioms. Information Sciences 221, 192-200 (2013)
5. Castro, J.L., Trillas, E., Cubillo, S.: On consequence in approximate reasoning.Journal of
Applied Non-Classical Logics 4(1), 91-103 (1994)
6. Chakraborty, M.K.: Use of fuzzy set theory in introducinggraded consequence in multiple
valued logic. In: Gupta, M.M., Yamakawa, T. (eds.) Fuzzy Logic in Knowledge-Based Sys-
tems, Decision and Control, pp. 247-257. Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V(North Holland)
(1988)
7. Chakraborty, M.K.: Graded Consequence: further studies. Journal of Applied Non-Classical
Logics 5(2), 127-137 (1995)
8. Chakraborty, M.K., Basu, S.: Graded Consequence and some Metalogical Notions General-
ized. Fundamenta Informaticae 32, 299-311 (1997)
9. Chakraborty, M.K., Dutta, S.: Graded Consequence Revisited. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 161,
1885-1905 (2010)
10. Cornelis, C., Deschrijver, G., Kerre, E.E.: Implication in intuitionistic fuzzy and interval-
valued fuzzy set theory: construction, classification, application. International Journal of Ap-
proximate Reasoning 35, 55-95 (2004)
11. Deschrijver, G., Kerre, E.E.: Classes of intuitionistic fuzzy t-norms satisfying the residuation
principle. Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 11, 691-709 (2003)
12. Deschrijver, G., Cornelis, C.: Representability in interval-valued fuzzy set theory. Interna-
tional Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 15(3), 345-361
(2007)
13. Dutta, S., Basu, S., Chakraborty, M.K.: Many-valued logics, fuzzy logics and graded con-
sequence: a comparative appraisal. In: Lodaya, K. (ed.) ICLA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7750,
pp. 197-209. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
14. Dutta, S., Chakraborty, M.K.: Graded consequence with fuzzy set of premises. Fundamenta
Informaticae 133, 1-18 (2014)
15. Li, D., Li, Y.: Algebraic structures of interval-valued fuzzy (S, N)-implications. Int. J. Ap-
prox. Reasoning 53(6), 892-900 (2012)
16. Gasse, B.V., et al.: On the properties of a generalized class of t-norms in interval-valued
fuzzy logics. New Mathematics and Natural Computation 2(1), 29-41 (2006)
17. Gentzen, G.: Investigations into Logical Deductions In: the collected papers of Gentzen, G.,
Szabo, M.E. (ed.), pp. 68-131. North Holland Publications, Amsterdam (1969)
18. Gerla, G.: Fuzzy Logic: Mathematical Tools for Approximate Reasoning.Kluwer Academic
Publishers (2001)
19. Rodrıguez, R.O., Esteva, F., Garcia, P., Godo, L.: On implicative closure operators in ap-
proximate reasoning. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 33, 159-184 (2003)
20. Shoesmith, D.J., Smiley, T.J.: Multiple Conclusion Logic. Cambridge University Press
(1978)
21. Tarski, A.: MethodologyofDeductive Sciences. In Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics,
pp. 60-109. Clavendon Press (1956)
